a

Free vs Paid Embedded Analytics: When “Free” Embedded Analytics Becomes Expensive

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email

When free tools exist, what’s the real cost of “free” embedded analytics and when does paying make sense?

TL;DR

Free Metabase costs $18,000-$48,000/year in hidden engineering time (setup, maintenance, security patches). At 50+ customers, DIY multi-tenancy becomes a security liability. Paid options (Metabase Pro at $500/mo or alternatives like Knowi) are often cheaper than “free” once you factor in engineering hours, infrastructure, and risk. Pay when security matters, analytics is a product feature, or your engineers have better things to build.

Table of Contents

The Embedded Analytics Dilemma

You’re building a SaaS product. Your customers want dashboards. They want charts. They want to slice and dice their data without filing support tickets.

So you Google “embedded analytics” and discover Metabase – an open-source BI tool that promises beautiful dashboards you can embed in your app. For free.

The question isn’t whether Metabase works. It does. The question is: should you pay for embedded analytics, or is open-source good enough?

Let’s break it down.

What Metabase Offers (Free vs. Paid)

Metabase has become the darling of the startup world. It’s genuinely impressive for an open-source tool:

Metabase Open Source (Free)

  • Self-hosted deployment
  • Connect to 20+ databases
  • Drag-and-drop query builder
  • SQL editor for power users
  • Basic dashboards and visualizations
  • Public link sharing
  • Simple iframe embedding

Metabase Pro/Enterprise (Paid)

FeaturePro ($500/mo)Enterprise (Custom)
SSO/SAML
Row-level permissions
Embedded analytics SDK
White-labeling
Audit logs
Advanced caching
Priority support
Sandboxing (data isolation)

The gap between free and paid is significant and it’s exactly where most teams hit friction.

Once teams decide to pay, they usually evaluate a short list of embedded analytics options based on their data stack, customer profile, and security needs. The next step is comparing how these tools behave in real, customer-facing environments.

The Hidden Costs of “Free” Embedded Analytics

1. Engineering Time is Not Free

Let’s do the math. Your engineering team costs roughly $150-200/hour fully loaded. Here’s what “free” Metabase embedding actually requires:

Initial Setup (40-80 hours)

  • Infrastructure provisioning and hardening
  • Database connection configuration
  • Authentication integration
  • Embedding implementation
  • Basic customization

Ongoing Maintenance (10-20 hours/month)

  • Security patches and upgrades
  • Performance monitoring
  • Bug fixes
  • User support escalations

Annual hidden cost: $18,000 – $48,000 in engineering time alone.

That “free” tool just became expensive.

2. The Multi-Tenancy Problem

Here’s where Metabase’s free tier breaks down for SaaS products:

Scenario: You have 100 customers. Each customer should only see their own data.

With free Metabase:

  • No row-level security
  • No data sandboxing
  • You’re building custom middleware to filter queries
  • One misconfigured dashboard = data leak = lawsuit

With paid Metabase (or alternatives):

  • Built-in row-level permissions
  • Tenant isolation out of the box
  • Audit trails for compliance

The security risk of DIY multi-tenancy isn’t worth the savings. For a deep dive into what proper tenant isolation looks like, see Embedded Analytics Architecture for SaaS: What Most Teams Get Wrong.

3. White-Labeling Matters More Than You Think

Your customers don’t want to see “Powered by Metabase” in their analytics dashboard. They want it to feel native to your product.

Free Metabase embedding:

  • Metabase branding visible
  • Limited CSS customization
  • Iframe-based (looks embedded, feels embedded)
  • No custom fonts or themes

Paid embedding:

  • Full white-label capability
  • Native look and feel
  • SDK-based integration
  • Your brand, your experience

Customer perception = product value.

Clunky third-party branding undermines the premium you’re trying to charge. See White-Label Embedded Analytics: Complete Guide for SaaS for what full white-labeling actually looks like.

4. Support at 3 AM

Your analytics dashboard goes down on a Friday night. With self-hosted open-source:

  • You’re on your own
  • Community forums are your lifeline
  • Your on-call engineer is debugging infrastructure instead of shipping features

With paid solutions:

  • Priority support channels
  • SLAs with guaranteed response times
  • Someone else’s problem (partially)

When Free Metabase Actually Makes Sense

Let’s be fair. Paid isn’t always the answer.

Use free Metabase when:

  1. Internal analytics only — Your team uses it, not customers
  2. Early-stage startup — You have more time than money
  3. Simple use cases — Single-tenant, no compliance requirements
  4. Technical co-founder — Someone enjoys maintaining infrastructure
  5. Proof of concept — Validating that customers even want analytics

Real example: A seed-stage startup with 10 customers can absolutely run free Metabase. The founder can handle updates on weekends, and customers are forgiving of rough edges.

When You Should Pay for Embedded Analytics

Signal 1: You’re Selling to Enterprises

Enterprise customers ask questions like:

  • “Is it SOC 2 compliant?”
  • “Can we get audit logs?”
  • “Does it support our SSO provider?”

If you’re answering “no” or “we’re working on it,” you’re losing deals.

Signal 2: Analytics is a Product Differentiator

If your pitch includes “powerful analytics” or “real-time insights,” that feature needs to be polished. Customers will compare you to Tableau, Looker, and dedicated BI tools, not other startups with janky iframes. See how modern BI compares across Knowi, Tableau, Power BI, and Qlik.

Signal 3: You Have More Than 50 Customers

The multi-tenancy tax grows linearly with customer count. At 50+ customers:

  • Data isolation bugs become statistically likely
  • Custom filtering logic becomes a maintenance nightmare
  • One security incident costs more than years of paid subscriptions

Signal 4: Your Engineers Have Better Things to Do

Every hour spent maintaining Metabase infrastructure is an hour not spent on your core product. At Series A and beyond, this trade-off rarely makes sense. For a structured approach to the build vs. buy decision for embedded analytics, we break it down here.

Metabase vs. The Competition

If you’re going to pay, should you pay Metabase—or look elsewhere?

SolutionStarting PriceBest For
Metabase Pro$500/moTeams already using free Metabase
Metabase EnterpriseCustomLarge orgs needing advanced security
Looker (Google)$5,000+/moEnterprise, complex data modeling
Tableau Embedded$35/user/moTraditional BI power users
Preset (Superset)$20/user/moOpen-source preference, managed hosting
Cumul.ioCustomDeveloper-first embedding
Explo$500/moModern SaaS embedding
KnowiCustomMongoDB/NoSQL native analytics

Metabase’s Sweet Spot

Metabase Pro hits a sweet spot for:

  • Mid-market SaaS (50-500 customers)
  • Teams with existing Metabase investment
  • PostgreSQL/MySQL-heavy stacks
  • Budget-conscious but scaling

Where Metabase Falls Short

  • Real-time streaming data – Better served by specialized tools
  • Complex data modeling – Looker’s LookML is more powerful
  • Highly custom visualizations – SDK is good, not great
  • Non-technical end users – Steeper learning curve than some alternatives

The ROI Calculation

Let’s make this concrete. You’re a B2B SaaS company with:

  • 100 customers paying $500/month average
  • 5 engineers at $180K/year salary
  • Growing 10% month-over-month

Option A: Free Metabase

  • Engineering time: 15 hours/month × $100/hour = $1,500/month
  • Infrastructure costs: $200/month (servers, monitoring)
  • Security risk exposure: Unquantified but real
  • Total: ~$1,700/month + risk

Option B: Metabase Pro ($500/month)

  • Subscription: $500/month
  • Engineering time: 3 hours/month × $100/hour = $300/month
  • Infrastructure: $100/month (simpler setup)
  • Security: Covered by vendor
  • Total: ~$900/month

Option B is cheaper. And this gap widens as you scale.

Making the Decision

Here’s a framework:

Decision framework for choosing paid vs free embedded analytics based on product criticality, scale, and security needs.
Decision framework for choosing paid vs free embedded analytics based on product criticality, scale, and security needs.

The Bottom Line

Free Metabase is a fantastic tool. It democratized analytics for thousands of companies who couldn’t afford enterprise BI.

But “free” has a cost. In engineering hours, security risk, and product perception.

Pay for embedded analytics when:

  • Security and compliance matter
  • Your time is worth more than $500/month
  • Analytics is part of your product’s value proposition
  • You’re scaling beyond early-stage

Stick with free when:

  • You’re validating the concept
  • It’s internal-only
  • You genuinely have more time than money

The best choice isn’t always the cheapest one. Sometimes the best choice is the one that lets you focus on what you’re actually building.

Next Steps

  1. Audit your current setup — How many engineering hours go into analytics maintenance?
  2. Talk to customers — What analytics features would they pay more for?
  3. Trial paid options — Most offer 14-30 day trials. Actually use them.
  4. Calculate your real costs — Include engineering time, not just subscription fees.

The goal isn’t to spend money. The goal is to spend money wisely—and sometimes that means paying for something you could technically get for free.

Have questions about embedded analytics for your product? The decision isn’t always obvious, but the framework above should help you think through the trade-offs systematically.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does “free” Metabase actually cost?

When you factor in engineering time for setup (40-80 hours), ongoing maintenance (10-20 hours/month), and infrastructure costs, free Metabase typically costs $18,000-$48,000/year in hidden expenses. This doesn’t include the cost of security incidents from DIY multi-tenancy or the opportunity cost of engineers maintaining analytics infrastructure instead of building product features.

Is Metabase Pro worth $500/month?

For most SaaS companies with 50+ customers, yes. Metabase Pro includes row-level permissions, SAML SSO, the embedded analytics SDK, and white-labeling—features that would cost significantly more to build and maintain yourself. The ROI calculation typically shows that Metabase Pro ($900/month total including reduced engineering time) is cheaper than free Metabase ($1,700/month in engineering and infrastructure costs).

When should I stick with free Metabase?

Free Metabase makes sense for internal-only analytics, early-stage startups with more time than money, single-tenant applications without compliance requirements, proof-of-concept projects validating customer demand for analytics, and teams with a technical founder who enjoys maintaining infrastructure.

What’s the biggest risk of using free Metabase for customer-facing analytics?

The biggest risk is data leakage from DIY multi-tenancy. Free Metabase has no row-level security, no data sandboxing, and no audit trails. You’re building custom middleware to filter queries, and one misconfigured dashboard means one customer can see another customer’s data—a potential lawsuit and trust-destroying incident.

How does Metabase compare to Knowi for embedded analytics?

Metabase excels for teams with PostgreSQL/MySQL stacks who want flexibility and control, especially at moderate scale. Knowi is purpose-built for customer-facing SaaS analytics with native multi-tenancy, full white-labeling, and cross-source joins (including MongoDB and NoSQL). Metabase’s per-user pricing scales linearly, while Knowi offers flat pricing. For a detailed comparison, see Best Embedded Analytics Tools 2025.

Can Metabase connect to MongoDB or NoSQL databases?

Metabase supports MongoDB as a data source, but its query builder and embedding features are optimized for SQL databases like PostgreSQL and MySQL. For MongoDB-native analytics with features like native query syntax, cross-source joins, and embedded analytics, see how MongoDB Charts, Metabase, and Knowi compare.

What should I look for when evaluating paid embedded analytics tools?

Key evaluation criteria include: native multi-tenancy (not just injected filters), SSO tied to your app’s auth system, full white-label control without CSS hacks, predictable pricing as customers scale, cross-source analytics if your product requires it, and vendor support with SLAs. For a structured approach, see the build vs. buy decision framework for embedded analytics.

See why paying for embedded will mak emore sense! Request a Demo.

Sanskriti Garg

Sanskriti Garg

Sanskriti Garg is the Marketing Manager at Knowi, where she leads all marketing initiatives for the company. She oversees positioning, messaging, go-to-market strategy, and campaigns that help Knowi reach businesses looking to unify, analyze, and act on their data with powerful AI analytics. Sanskriti brings over 8 years of marketing experience, with a strong consumer-focused mindset and storytelling skills. Her expertise spans marketing, demand generation, AI, and analytics, and she’s passionate about making advanced analytics accessible and impactful for organizations of all sizes.

Want to See Knowi in Action?

Connect your databases, run cross-source joins, and ask questions in plain English. No warehouse required.

See Knowi in action
Connect your databases, query across sources, and run AI on-premises. No warehouse required.
Book a Demo